« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 »
August 31, 2006
Cheapskate PTO
There
has been acrimonious disagreement at the Patent Office over the Millennium
Agreement, a 2001 contested contract that was supposed to maintain a 10%-15% pay
scale differential between examiners and your average government bureaucrat; the
point being, to retain highly educated and skilled examiners, thus minimizing
turnover and maximizing patent quality. It hasn't worked out that way, because
agency management reneged.
Continue reading "Cheapskate PTO"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 6:26 PM | The Patent Office | Comments (2)
August 30, 2006
Obviousness Aligned
One
might get the impression, for all the ruckus over KSR v. Teleflex in front of
the Supreme Court, that 35 U.S.C. §103(a), the prior art obviousness clause, is
broken. Not so. §103 is badly drafted, but it has teeth as currently interpreted
by the Appeals Court. If you think its teeth need further straightening, consider this
orthodontics case: Ormco v. Align (CAFC
05-1426).
Continue reading "Obviousness Aligned"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:00 PM | Prior Art
August 29, 2006
Impermissible Hindsight
Unbiased rational logic is a rare bird. Our
minds offer a veneer of abstraction processing over a reptilian brain bathed in
emotional opium. With regard to patent law, the bias
towards impermissible hindsight in denigrating invention is incontrovertible.
To wit, the vast majority of amici briefs in
KSR v. Teleflex have been displays of wishful thinking at best, corrupt rhetoric at
worst; regardless, confusion of delusion that hindsight can be hindered by
anything other than objective evidence.
Continue reading "Impermissible Hindsight"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:42 PM | Prior Art
August 27, 2006
Blackboard Rattles
The
Washington Post reports today "an angry backlash from the academic computing
community" for Blackboard
asserting its freshly minted
6,988,138 against
Desire2Learn. The worry is, of
course, the broad claims of '138. Not reported is whether the academic computing
community has enrolled for anger management help.
Continue reading "Blackboard Rattles"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 5:12 PM | Litigation | Comments (1)
August 25, 2006
Patented News Vans
This
is but the first shot of what may become an all-out patent war on news vans:
those mobile TV studios-in-a-van, with a satellite uplink, for on-the-spot news
coverage. Indiana-based Trans Video Electronics (TVE) sued
Echostar Tuesday in Northern California for infringing
5,903,621 & continuation
5,991,801. The entire TV news business is worried.
Continue reading "Patented News Vans"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:29 PM | Litigation
USPTO Plan
Average
patent pendency is now at 27 months, with high-tech wait
times nearly double that. Some inventors have waited 12 years before getting
their patent grant. There is a serious shortage of examiners, and turnover is
high: only 45% of current employees have been there for over five years. But
the
patent office has a plan for the next five years.
Posted by Patent Hawk at 2:41 PM | The Patent Office
NetFlix Rebuffed
Netflix
sued Blockbuster for patent infringement in April, and
Blockbuster retorted in countersuit that Netflix was just attempting
monopolization via unenforceable patents; unenforceable owing to inequitable
conduct: that Netflix didn't disclose known prior art. Netflix tried,
unsuccessfully, to get the judge to dismiss the countersuit.
Continue reading "NetFlix Rebuffed"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:00 AM | Inequitable Conduct
August 24, 2006
Apple Gets Creative
Apple
Computer rather graciously ended its dispute with Creative Technology,
apparently perceiving merit in Creative's iPod-related patents; gracious to the
tune of $100 million.
Continue reading "Apple Gets Creative"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 2:18 AM | Patents In Business | Comments (1)
August 23, 2006
Memory Mudfight Stayed
The
ongoing DRAM brouhaha between Hynix and patent-holder Rambus is chilling out,
pending a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) decision in its antitrust investigation
against Rambus.
Continue reading "Memory Mudfight Stayed"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:19 PM | Litigation
August 22, 2006
The Microsoft Way
On
Friday, Eastern District of Texas Judge Leonard Davis upped the ante by $25
million that Microsoft must pay for
willfully infringing z4's product activation patents, as well as paying an
additional $2 million towards z4 legal fees.
The judge's
opinion, largely
unreported in the press: Microsoft is an incredible weasel.
Continue reading "The Microsoft Way"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 11:59 AM | Litigation
Timeline Grinds Microsoft
In
1999, Microsoft took a limited license with Timeline for its patented database
technology. The scope of that agreement has been contentious, the term
"agreement" used loosely, as Timeline & Microsoft have wrangled in court over it
ever since. Now Timeline has terminated the license, accusing Microsoft of
breaching its terms by inducing infringement, and is suing Microsoft for
damages.
Continue reading "Timeline Grinds Microsoft"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:02 AM | Patents In Business
August 21, 2006
Sailing Towards Patent Reform
The
strongest push for patent reform came from large computer technology companies; as
serial patent infringers, troubled at continually facing the prospect of
injunctions granted by the CAFC nearly automatic like a dog. The solution worth
bribing for - get Congress to pass a new law gutting patent enforcement. Then
came the Supreme Court in
eBay v. MercExchange, "case law" being the accurate euphemism, which took
the wind out of the sails for legislative patent reform.
Continue reading "Sailing Towards Patent Reform"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:02 AM | The Patent System | Comments (1)
August 20, 2006
Irreparable Harm
In
the months following the
Supreme Court eBay v. MercExchange decision, recent rulings demonstrate a
revised trend in granting injunctions, most notably recognizing marketplace
clout. Granting a permanent injunction to TiVo against competitor EchoStar,
though stayed for the time being, illustrates the power injunctive relief can
provide.
Continue reading "Irreparable Harm"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:28 PM | Injunction | Comments (2)
August 18, 2006
Tissue Issues
Cook
Biotech, exclusive licensee, and Purdue Research Foundation, owner of
5,554,389, sued ACell for infringement. In the appeal (CAFC
05-1458), there was
a significant issue of claim construction, an interesting insight into seeking
damages, and an applied corollary to the "all limitations" rule in figuring
infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
Continue reading "Tissue Issues"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:33 PM | Case Law
August 16, 2006
Seedy
The
Scruggs brothers planted, without license, Monsanto genetically modified,
herbicide resistant, soybeans and cotton. Monsanto asserted
5,352,605;
5,196,525; and
5,322,938 against them. Ornery, the Scruggs went down fighting, in trial and
on appeal (CAFC 04-1532).
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:24 PM | Antitrust
August 15, 2006
Carded
In
a classic case of overreaching, E-Pass
Technologies was shot down for the second time for trying to pose a
multi-function electronic card, claimed in
5,276,311, as a personal digital assistant (PDA), first suing Palm
unsuccessfully, then Microsoft and HP. In the Southern District of Texas, Judge
Hoyt ruled in favor of Microsoft & HP, that PDAs were not "cards," that
non-infringement was so obvious as to be a matter of law, and thus granting
summary judgment.
Posted by Patent Hawk at 4:10 PM | Litigation
August 14, 2006
Claim Construction Black Hole
Hal
Wegner uncorks an update to his 2005 paper, "The
Non-Precedential Claim Construction Black Hole," elaborating on: 1) the mess
of non-precedential Federal Circuit rulings related to patent claim
construction; 2) the blanket of secrecy maintained by the USPTO Patent Board of
Appeals & Interferences; 3) claim construction as a matter of law affords
flip-flop arguments on appeal.
Continue reading "Claim Construction Black Hole"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:20 PM | Claim Construction
August 11, 2006
Wall Street Patents
The
New York Times has an
interesting article in today's business section about the ongoing frenzy of
business method patents among financial service firms such as Citigroup and
Goldman Sachs.
Continue reading "Wall Street Patents"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:00 AM | Patents In Business
August 10, 2006
State Immunity XI, Take 2
The
University of Texas sued 48 cell phone companies in the Western District of
Texas for infringing
4,674,112, which claims predictive typing. Tegic Communications, a
Washington state company that sells the software for 39 of the 48 companies,
filed for declaratory judgment in the Western District of Washington. The
University sought to dismiss the case in Washington on several grounds,
including state immunity from suit in federal courts under the 11th Amendment.
Case dismissed. Upon appeal, same result (CAFC
05-1553).
Continue reading "State Immunity XI, Take 2"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 10:16 PM | Case Law
August 9, 2006
Protecting its Own
By
the power of the XI Amendment to the Constitution, the United States indemnifies
its states. Protected by the Constitution, a state may infringe a patent without
practical remedy afforded the patent holder, the Federal Appeals Court
affirmed today (05-1440).
Continue reading "Protecting its Own"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 11:57 AM | Case Law
August 8, 2006
Big Media Blowout
In
one of the smaller ironies limping around, Big Media went bust, and the creditor
clean-up crew is
trying to scrape some revenue out of selling
6,385,592
and a continuation application; a bit shabby offering in lack of proper
maintenance, but potential exists to rock e-commerce companies that offer
personalized advertising.
Continue reading "Big Media Blowout"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:47 AM | Patents In Business
August 7, 2006
Norwegian Wood
To
say that Norwegian Ole K. Nilssen went about it the wrong way would be
understatement. Though not found guilty of unclean hands, the man is a disgrace.
Pray tell, I am referring to five kinds of inequitable conduct. Is there a
Guinness record for this sort of thing?!
Continue reading "Norwegian Wood"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:45 PM | Inequitable Conduct
August 5, 2006
Senate Patent Gutting Bill
Anne Broache of CNET News.com waxes optimistic by reporting that "the U.S. patent system could be inching closer to an overhaul long desired by the technology industry," but otherwise gives a good synopsis of the dead-on-arrival Hatch-Leahy bill, which seeks to eviscerate patent enforcement. Could be a good calling card to solicit campaign contributions, but thank goodness these corporate toads' efforts are for naught, at least this year.
Posted by Patent Hawk at 11:18 AM | The Patent System
Selective Memory
Reportage
is a tricky business. Situations are often not as they first appear. Corruption
being endemic, intrinsic to human nature, news and history often prevail from
power, either to enforce or deny. On that happy note, we turn to the domestic
computer DRAM market, which seems to be a large-scale exercise in manipulation
all around.
Continue reading "Selective Memory"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:01 AM | Litigation
August 4, 2006
Bad Deceiver
In Bayer AG v. Housey Pharmaceuticals, today the U.S. Court of Appeals (CAFC 06-1083) affirmed that Dr. Gerard M. Housey is a lying weasel, his four patents 4,980,281; 5,266,464; 5,688,655; and 5,877,007 voided for inequitable conduct. This guy made a seriously lousy impression on the court.
Continue reading "Bad Deceiver"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 10:52 AM | Inequitable Conduct
August 3, 2006
Dilbert at the PTO
As
a confidential source inside the patent office put it, "When I worked in the
private sector, I might not have always agreed with management, but at least I
saw evidence of some consistent internal logic for their reasoning and decision.
But here at the PTO, it's like working in a live-action
Dilbert cartoon, although with a more
relaxed dress code."
Continue reading "Dilbert at the PTO"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:45 PM | The Patent Office
August 2, 2006
Dependent Claims
Pfizer
sued generic drug maker Ranbaxy for
infringing patents related to Pfizer's blockbuster, cholesterol-lowering
Lipitor®.
Ranbaxy was found to have infringed, which it appealed, and lost on one of the
asserted patents. But the interesting part of today's CAFC ruling (06-1179),
where Ranbaxy prevailed,
concerns statutory definition of dependent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 4,
which requires that a dependent claim narrow the scope of the claim upon which it
depends.
Continue reading "Dependent Claims"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 6:21 PM | Claim Construction
Sneaky Rambus
Rambus
has been enforcing its memory patents against semiconductor companies,
racking up royalties. The wondrous trick was that the claimed technology was
rolled into the standard for computer memories. Today the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission ruled that Rambus knew just what it was doing, and thus unlawfully
gaining monopolistic rent, as economists put it, for four memory chip
technologies.
Continue reading "Sneaky Rambus"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 10:47 AM | Patents In Business | Comments (1)
August 1, 2006
U2 Plays At The ITC
In
a rare infringement assertion, Microsoft
filed a complaint today with the International Trade Commission (ITC) against
Belkin over patented U2 peripheral
interface technology.
Continue reading "U2 Plays At The ITC"
Posted by Patent Hawk at 5:19 PM | Litigation
Ericsson Unleashes on Samsung, Again
Filing
in the Eastern District of Texas Friday,
Ericsson slammed Samsung with another infringement suit, asserting 11 mobile
phone patents, in a continuing string to sting the Korean company into
submission.
prior art search + 
Newsfeed (RSS)