« Obviousness Vampire | Main | Earshot »
July 10, 2007
Mission Accomplished
The
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) concluded review of proposed USTPO rules related to
examination procedures, blithely approving them as "consistent with change." OMB
views the rule changes as economically insignificant. No one else does.
The rule to limit continuations (0651-AB93) was particularly opposed, as it disrupts the normal practice of securing sufficient claim coverage for an invention. The rule curtailing the number of claims examined (0651-AB94), in combination with continuation limits, offers the prospect, as one wag put it, "to illegalize patents on complex inventions."
AGENCY: DOC-PTO RIN: 0651-AB93 TITLE: Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice, and Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims ABSTRACT: The Office revises the rules of practice to share the burden of examining an application if the applicant has filed multiple continuing applications or multiple requests for continued examination. The revised rules would require that second or subsequent continuation applications and second or subsequent requests for continued examination of an application include a showing as to why the amendment, argument, or evidence presented was not previously submitted. The revised rules would also ease the burden of examining multiple applications that have the same effective filing date, overlapping disclosure, a common inventor, and common assignee by requiring that all patentably indistinct claims in such applications be submitted in a single application absent good and sufficient reason. These changes would allow the Office to apply the patent examining resources currently absorbed by multiple continuing applications and requests for continued examination that simply recycle earlier applications to the examination of new applications and thus allow the Office to reduce the backlog of unexamined applications. This will mean faster, more efficient examination for the typical applicant without any additional work on the applicant's part, but a small minority of applicants who consume a disproportionate share of Agency resources will be required to share the burden they place on the Agency. STAGE: Final Rule ECONOMICALLY SIGNIFICANT: No RECEIVED DATE: 04/10/2007 LEGAL DEADLINE: None COMPLETED: 07/09/2007 COMPLETED ACTION: Consistent with Change AGENCY: DOC-PTO RIN: 0651-AB94 TITLE: Changes to Practice for the Examination of Claims in Patent Applications ABSTRACT: A small but significant minority of applications contain an excessive number of claims, which makes effective examination of such applications problematic. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (Office) revises the rules of practice to share the burden of examining applications containing an excessive number of claims. Specifically, the Office amends the rules to provide that if an application contains more than 10 independent claims, the applicant must provide a patentability report that covers all of the independent claims in the application. In addition, the Office amends the rules to provide that the Office will give a separate examination only to those dependent claims expressly elected for separate examination, and that the applicant must provide a patentability report that covers all of the independent claims and elected dependent claims in the application if the number of independent claims plus the number of dependent claims elected for examination is greater than 10. The changes would allow the Office to apply the patent examining resources currently absorbed by applications that contain an excessive number of claims to the examination of new applications, and thus allow the Office to reduce the backlog of unexamined applications. This would mean faster, more effective examination for the typical applicant without any additional work on the applicant's part, but a small minority of applicants who consume a disproportionate share of agency resources will be required to share the burden they place on the Agency. STAGE: Final Rule ECONOMICALLY SIGNIFICANT: No RECEIVED DATE: 04/10/2007 LEGAL DEADLINE: None COMPLETED: 07/09/2007 COMPLETED ACTION: Consistent with Change
Political pressure to amend implementation will now be applied to patent agency management.
Previous Patent Prospector coverage: July 3, 2007; June 26, 2007; June 23, 2007; June 16, 2007; March 2, 2007; February 28, 2007
Posted by Patent Hawk at July 10, 2007 11:36 AM | The Patent Office