« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 31, 2007

So Nice of You to Call

After shelling out to settle patent suits from Verizon, Sprint and AT&T, Vonage gracefully settles for a cross-license with Nortel; a pleasant way to end the year.

Continue reading "So Nice of You to Call"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:08 PM | Patents In Business

Rear View 2007

2007 was a raucous year for patents. The high courts and patent office shuffled the deck chairs like madmen. Patents sleazed and slimed in the hallowed halls of the whores of Congress. Business as usual as a few patents went big bang for the buck, while others crashed on the shoals of a new artificial reef called KSR.

Continue reading "Rear View 2007"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:27 PM | The Patent System | Comments (4)

December 29, 2007

Packing Heat, Not Light

Sen. Patrick Leahy [D-VT] and Sen. Orrin Hatch [R-UT] were kissing each other's ass on the Senate floor December 18. The comity is affecting, but these guys are dangerous goons, given to impulsive action: "urgent need to modernize our patent laws," they quiver. The real urgent need is not to screw inventors into the ground to pacify serial patent infringers.

Continue reading "Packing Heat, Not Light"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:06 AM | The Patent System | Comments (2)

December 27, 2007


A patent embodies a simple concept of private property, that of invention. Those opposed to the concept rage against it in vicarious ways, to weaken its power, as the concept itself endures. Ironically, current USPTO management tries to shuck its core responsibility of patent examination, by contriving elaborate rules and justifications to render its sloth less odious. The patent office's self-destruction has cheering supporters.

Continue reading "Hoot"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:20 PM | The Patent Office | Comments (5)

December 26, 2007


Hyperphase sued Google for infringing four patents with Google's AutoLink and AdSense technologies. AutoLink, part of Google Toolbar, adds links to a web page. AdSense puts context-sensitive ads on web pages. The district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement on a narrow claim construction; overturned, because a nominal claim reference to one can be plural.

Continue reading "Singular"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 11:29 AM | Claim Construction

December 25, 2007


Online auction house eBay and satellite virtual bank PayPal dodged errant bullets shot by Netcraft: 6,351,739 and 6,976,008. The claims go to "an Internet billing method." Summary judgment of non-infringement was granted because the claims required "providing a communications link through equipment of the third party;" in other words, an Internet service provider (ISP). eBay and Paypal don't do that.

Continue reading "Unlinked"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:06 AM | Case Law

December 23, 2007

Proposed Patent Reform and the Market for Ideas

Dictatorial_democracy.jpg Back in September, Dennis Crouch published a good summary of the patent reform legislation.  In an earlier post, I described how the Internet, by reducing the transaction costs associated with identifying valid patented technology, is facilitating an emerging market for ideas.  Patent reform legislation obviously has the potential to either promote or destroy this emerging market.  Here are a few thoughts on how the specific proposals for patent reform would affect the emerging market for ideas.

Continue reading "Proposed Patent Reform and the Market for Ideas"

Posted by Michael Martin at 11:51 AM | The Patent System | Comments (5)

December 22, 2007


Flexsys slammed Sinorgchem at the ITC, winning a limited exclusion order. Sinorgchem appealed. The CAFC instructed the ITC on claim construction.

Continue reading "Lexicography"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:38 AM | Claim Construction | Comments (5)

December 21, 2007


USPTO management is pushing rule-crack on examiners, who are smoking it. Rule-crack: crystallized infractions homeopathically processed so that they don't even exist in CFR form. Before rampant rule-crack ingestion, the majority of examiners were randomly competent at best. Engendering curmudgeonly denial of due process, rule-crack is spawning egregious intellectual property theft.

Continue reading "Rule-Crack"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:10 AM | Prosecution | Comments (7)

December 20, 2007


4,976,388 claims a shoulder strap with a bit of give. John Wleklinski, dba Comfort Strapp, sued Targus for infringement. Targus got a summary judgment of non-infringement, its strap not meeting two claim limitations; easily upheld on appeal in a non-precedential decision.

Continue reading "Strapped"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:26 AM | Litigation

December 19, 2007

Have a Cigar

Insisting on injunctive relief for patent infringement by eBay for its "Buy it now" feature, MercExchange is like a pit bull with rags for brains. After last year's overturning the CAFC practice of granting injunctions "automatic like a dog," the Supreme Court decision in eBay v. MercExchange sewed a new garment out of old cloth, updating "the traditional four-factor test" for granting injunctions: (1) are you screwed without an injunction?; (2) what do you mean, money's not enough? (the prostitution test); (3) considering both sides, who's seriously damaged one way or the other?; (4) are consumers screwed by an injunction?. Back in deliverance district court after giving MercExchange $30 million in eBay bucks, the judge had MercExchange squeal like a pig.

Continue reading "Have a Cigar"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:29 PM | Injunction

Ritual Fulfillment

Patent enforcer TPL Group and Patriot Scientific, holding microprocessor patents, witnessed the ritual of bended knee and open wallet by Matsushita/Panasonic, Toshiba, JVC, and NEC. Trial was docketed for next month in the Eastern District of Texas.

Continue reading "Ritual Fulfillment"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:12 AM | Patents In Business | Comments (1)

December 18, 2007


As Vonage is learning, VoIP is an acronym for "voice over intellectual property." After acquiring Digital Packet Licensing last year, which had its own patent assertion going against Nortel Networks, Vonage unwisely let it continue. Slow on the uptake from its expensive losses to Verizon, Sprint-Nextel and AT&T, Vonage now faces a counterclaim from Nortel.

Continue reading "VoIP"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:19 PM | Litigation

Citing Prior Art

In many instances, the proposed IDS rules will create a prior art search dilemma for patent prosecutors. The new rules require extensive analysis of cited art, reportage that characterizes the claims and thus invites prosecution estoppel, hence hampering enforcement potential, particularly applying the doctrine of equivalents. In a field crowded with art, to minimize cost while maximizing patentability under the new IDS rules, a crafty prior art strategy is imperative.

Continue reading "Citing Prior Art"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:21 AM | Prosecution | Comments (2)

December 14, 2007

Compact Prosecution

Unable to staff its way out of its pendency hole, USPTO management seeks to address the problem by limiting continuations and RCEs. Seeking to gratify a grotesque bias, Ayal Sharon & Yifan Liu set out to statistically validate that conclusion. Instead, they proved what many prosecutors already knew: examiners' refusal to grant deserved patents. The root of the problem is a culture now steeped in political fear of being considered slack by granting junk patents, inspired by a short-sighted and incompetent management responding to pressure from well-funded propagandists.

Continue reading "Compact Prosecution"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:08 AM | The Patent Office | Comments (12)

December 13, 2007


Randi Black's 7,152,606 covers a nipple cover, one that got good coverage from Eastern District of Texas Judge John Love's Markman hearing, adopting most of the language the plaintiff preferred on the crucial term "nipple cover." The defendants had argued for an unreasonably narrow construction.

Continue reading "Covered"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:48 AM | Claim Construction | Comments (1)

Buy It Now

Judge Jerome Friedman of Eastern Virginia district court put the final tab of eBay infringing MercExchange's 5,845,265 with eBay's "Buy It Now" feature at $30 million. The case spawned a muddled SCOTUS ruling in May 2006 scotching the prospect for injunctions in many cases, to a nominal regime of payoff for infringement. Post-trial continuing infringement is not covered in the eBay case, and MercExchange hopes to squeeze more for it; while eBay likely appeals.

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:14 AM | Litigation

December 12, 2007

The Borderline

MPT successfully sued Marathon Labels and Polymeric Converting for patent infringement, and even got a permanent injunction, but an extra-territorial injunction that didn't withstand appeal.

Continue reading "The Borderline"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 6:00 PM | Litigation

What's the big IDeaS?

The Office of Management and Budget has approved the proposed Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) rule changes (full proposed rule). As poet Walt Whitman penned: "Do I contradict myself? Very well then, I contradict myself. I am large, I contain multitudes." But the USPTO isn't supposed to be poetic, or self-contradictory; it's supposed to grant valid patents. Worrying about decreasing pendency sets up an inherent self-contradiction, especially since the direct path to do so is closed: while management clings to denial as to cause, the agency admittedly suffers horrendous examiner turnover. So, the only way left to decrease pendency is to decrease examination time. Decreasing examination time necessarily increases the risk of granting patents badly: either erroneously granting junk patents, which the office used to regularly do, to not granting what should be valid patents, as the PTO has recently made its regular practice. Burden shifting to applicants is no substitute for impartial examination, and that's exactly the spirit of the proposed IDS rules.

Continue reading "What's the big IDeaS?"

Posted by Mr. Platinum at 3:06 PM | The Patent Office | Comments (1)

December 11, 2007


Qualcomm was the product of the vision and determination of founder Irwin Jacobs. Jacobs furthered a technology derived from torpedo guidance systems used during World War II into a global wireless standard. Jacobs also forged a business model with patents at the core: manufacturing via outsourcing, Qualcomm became, in essence, a patent licensing company. Facing a relentless squeeze, resentment built among licensees and competitors, igniting courtroom warfare, with the Big Q lighting the match.

Continue reading "Overplay"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 2:05 AM | Patents In Business | Comments (1)

December 10, 2007

Can't Touch This

Mere days after Margaret J.A. Peterlin was appointed Deputy Director of the patent office, before she even had a chance to prove herself an incompetent nincompoop, she's attacked in court by a self-righteous goon squad of do-gooders who don't want to give her the chance to prove herself an incompetent nincompoop. But the government isn't to be held accountable, and so a district court judge shucked the matter because the law is "vague."

Continue reading "Can't Touch This"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:25 PM | The Patent Office | Comments (3)

December 8, 2007

Patent Blog Troll

Anti-patent blogger Patent Troll Tracker (PTT), notoriously anonymous, has generated a lot of heat and little light in his spat with hugely successful patent litigator Ray Niro. PTT flatters himself that Niro put a $5,000 bounty out to identify him. Niro nails PTT with "I view these people [anonymous bloggers] as know-nothings, afraid to reveal their identity." Niro's missed opportunity was coining the term "patent blog troll," for patent bloggers who aren't patent practitioners. What special level of hell would Dante have reserved for the anonymous patent blog troll?

Continue reading "Patent Blog Troll"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 6:06 PM | The Patent System | Comments (8)

Big Iron

IBM used to be known as a supreme hardball player, even fending off a Justice Department antitrust suit. In present time, its increasing reliance on services has been an impetus to soften its public image. Its public patent stance is similar, recently espousing eschewing business method patents, which are subject to especial derision by the software companies that IBM has for its client base, as they are generally a threat. IBM terms such patents "soft," while continuing pursuit of that ilk deemed most significant. The anti-patent puttyheads may be fooled by IBM's feints, but make no mistake: IBM is still a hardball player. This week it filed against Taiwan-based ASUS, makers of excellent computer equipment, particularly motherboards, at the ITC, whose only remedy to offer is injunctive relief.

Continue reading "Big Iron"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:12 AM | Patents In Business | Comments (3)

December 7, 2007

The Polka

Fulbright & Jaworski has released its fourth annual survey of companies getting pipped and waltzing others in that toe-tapping polka affectionately known as litigation. In the patent department, F&J finds infringement claims rising like yeasty bread, with the big boys flinging more dough as well as being more frequently flung upon. Speaking of dough, the cost of the attending the polka parlor is worry number one, not the prospect of injunctive relief. Yet spend to dance they do.

Continue reading "The Polka"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 1:40 AM | Litigation

Golden Handshake

Kamil Idris, WIPO director general for the past decade, agreed to step down, after a typographical error in his birth date and some mix-up about his educational degrees caused an uproar. Idris will get a full year's salary of over $300,000 and full pension benefits. In related news, WIPO is changing its name to WIMPO, and, in Japanese, CHIMPO.

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:38 AM | International | Comments (4)

December 6, 2007


The Wall Street Journal:

Over the next few years, the pharmaceutical business will hit a wall. Some of the top-selling drugs in industry history will become history as patent protections expire, allowing generics to rush in at much-lower prices. Generic competition is expected to wipe $67 billion from top companies' annual U.S. sales between 2007 and 2012 as more than three dozen drugs lose patent protection. That is roughly half of the companies' combined 2007 U.S. sales.

Continue reading "Withdrawal"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:26 AM | Patents In Business

December 5, 2007

Swearing Back

In a losing battle for priority, Harold Garner showed the USPTO as a curmudgeonly weasel that doesn't abide by its own rules. Constructively, what today's appeals court decision reminds is that swearing back requires independent corroborating evidence showing prior reduction to practice, convincingly demonstrating that the claimed invention "worked for its intended purpose" at the claimed pre-filing priority date.

Continue reading "Swearing Back"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 5:26 PM | Prosecution

Patent Plasma Sensibility Spasm

In but a single example of an endless stream, Samsung and Matsushita, the world's largest plasma screen manufacturers, suffered a litigation meltdown: settling their dispute over their respective plasma screen patents. Fortunately for the companies respective lawyers, the two companies continue to bash each other over semiconductor and memory patents.

Continue reading "Patent Plasma Sensibility Spasm"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:59 AM | Patents In Business

December 4, 2007

Patent Tax

The United States' best known racketeering syndicate turns its green eye of jealousy towards patents: the IRS wants to know of any transactions under the aegis of a tax-related patent. As David Boundy at Cantor Fitzgerald wondered: "20%-off-sales at Sears of dishwashers covered by patents could become transactions that have to be reported to the IRS. Has the entire executive branch taken leave of its senses?" Who said there was ever any sense to take leave of?

Continue reading "Patent Tax"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 4:33 PM | The Patent System | Comments (4)

December 3, 2007


Patent rube Viet D. Dinh in the right-wing American Spectator sucks corporate fumes for air as he goes gung ho for the sorriest patent legislation since 1793.

An example of the litigation abuse engendered by the current system is the rise of "patent trolls," speculators who acquire and sue bona fide patentees but neither contribute to or otherwise expand the marketplace of ideas nor increase or improve consumers' choices. These speculators profit at the direct expense of consumers and risk-taking inventors and investors.

Wrong. Many inventors must rely upon patent enforcement firms, as they do not have the resources to practice their inventions, and infringing corporations more often than not refuse to negotiate patent licenses, relying upon their overwhelming financial resources to crush inventors in legal costs. Besides, patents are a commodity (that's why they are called "intellectual property"), subject to free trade; only a fascist would want it otherwise.

Continue reading "Opprobrium"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 12:27 PM | The Patent System | Comments (2)

December 2, 2007

Not Rusty

Edward "Rusty" Rose III stuffed his piggy bank, starting in the 1970s, shorting stocks. In 1989, Rusty and a rascal named George "Dubya" Bush, along with other investors, bought a controlling stake in the Texas Rangers baseball team. Oh yeah, Rusty's bankrolled King George along the way. Rusty kept shorting, acquiring a whiff of taint by shorting Terayon Communication Systems, then publicly bad-mouthing the company so as to make his prophesy bet self-fulfilling. Randy Rusty then decided to try his hand at the "sport of kings."

Continue reading "Not Rusty"

Posted by Patent Hawk at 3:51 PM | Patents In Business