August 24, 2008
By the Book
Responding to definitions of terms in a reexamination Examiner's Answer, an Appellant filed a reply that included dictionary definitions, to rebut the examiner's construction. The reply brief was refused entry, on the ground that the dictionary definitions constituted "new evidence." A petition to overturn was denied.
Thanks to Hal Wegner, who remarks on this case:
The patentee today who runs the gauntlet of patent reexamination is facing a much stricter road to sustain patentability than many have thought.
Previously, the patentee might have considered seeking a trial de novo under 35 USC § 145, but in 1999, in a little noticed amendment to the statute at the time, the trial de novo route has been abolished for reexamination proceedings: Only a direct appeal to the Federal Circuit remains open.
Posted by Patent Hawk at August 24, 2008 6:02 PM | Prosecution
omg man that's a great pic!
Posted by: e6k at August 26, 2008 6:22 PM